Date of Award

Spring 5-16-2026

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science (MS)

Department

Psychology

First Advisor

Dr. Paige Boydston

Second Advisor

Dr. Jamie Wood

Third Advisor

Dr. Kevin Elliott

Keywords

Feedback, false feedback, task performance

Abstract

Feedback is commonly used to increase future performance of the individual receiving the feedback. This study focused on the implementation of false negative, false positive, and true feedback procedures to measure its impact on task performance. Performance was measured through both accuracy of correct responding and response latency across conditions. The participants of this study were recruited from Pittsburg State University and participated in a series of computerized tests while receiving various feedback types using a multielement design. The findings of this study aligned with some previous studies indicating the feedback types did not produce meaningful changes task performance in the tests used. Additional research is needed to further evaluate the effectiveness of false feedback types, procedures, and test types in various tasks.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.