Date of Award

Summer 7-31-2019

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science (MS)

Department

Biological Science

First Advisor

Dr. Dixie Smith

Second Advisor

Dr. Hermann Nonnenmacher

Third Advisor

Dr. Ananda Jayawardhana

Keywords

Southeast Kansas Reclaimed Coal Mine Soils, Andropogon gerardi, Schizachyrium scoparium, Sorghastrum nutans, Panicum virgatum, Bouteloua curtipendula

Abstract

THE EFFECTS OF CLIPPING ON THE BIOMASS PRODUCTION OF NATIVE

WARM SEASON GRASSES ON RECLAIMED

ABANDONED COAL MINE SOILS

James A K Daniel

Strip mining leaves behind highly disrupted plant and soil communities. Mined land reclamation returns the land back to a natural or economically usable state, however, reclamation cannot completely restore the soils to their original state. Subsequently, normal frequencies of management practices may not be as effective as in undisturbed soils. Understanding how the severity of soil disturbance affects plant production is important for habitat rehabilitation and determining effective management techniques to be implemented following reclamation. This project addresses the questions of whether biomass production in warm season grasses on reclaimed coal mines is promoted or inhibited by clipping, and how clipping frequency affects productivity. Grasses were clipped to simulate mowing at three reclaimed mine sites and three undisturbed control sites. Three groups samples labeled A, B, and C were clipped three, two, and one times respectively.

Biomass production was reduced when grass was clipped before peak biomass production. An increase in clipping events reduced production even more. There were no significant differences between the disturbed and undisturbed sites suggesting that whether disturbed or not, cutting before peak production decreases overall biomass production. Analysis of treatments from all the sites showed the treatments that were clipped multiple times were significantly different from the treatment that was clipped once at peak production. Analysis of sites individually showed most sites did not show significance. Higher rates of clipping did not show significance. While not significant at most individual sites, biomass production was higher when samples were only clipped once, at peak biomass production and an increase in clipping decreased the grasses’ ability to recover after clipping in both disturbed and undisturbed sites.

Share

COinS
 
 

To view the content in your browser, please download Adobe Reader or, alternately,
you may Download the file to your hard drive.

NOTE: The latest versions of Adobe Reader do not support viewing PDF files within Firefox on Mac OS and if you are using a modern (Intel) Mac, there is no official plugin for viewing PDF files within the browser window.